When loading data in the VITO backend using the same bbox: {'west': 590647.7761173819, 'east': 595388.4372280851, 'south': 5490355.029930396, 'north': 5494155.316432625, 'crs': 'EPSG:32633'}
I get two different areas, where one of the two is downloaded using the same crs ("SENTINEL2_L1C_SENTINELHUB"). This netcdf uses the correct bounding box.
The other ("GLOBAL_SURFACE_WATER") is using EPSG 4326, and does not adhere to the bounding box (the bounding box of this downloaded netcdf is much larger). Any ideas how / why?
The current behaviour on vito backend is that downloading a single netcdf results in the full chunk that was processed rather than cropping it to the bounding box.
This is something I might be changing, as users are always confused by it.
Geotiff does crop to the bounding box.
Not in the docs, but perhaps on this forum.
Basically, when implementing like that, I reasoned that people wouldn’t mind to get a bit of extra data, but somehow it does seem to be a problem.
Google Earth Engine for instance also takes some liberty in interpreting what it will return.
Yes I know. Same with images and the clip functionality there. Also gives some confusion. In this case it was just some confusion for me, I do not mind it.